Criticality and the Multiplication Factor
The central question in nuclear criticality is simple: does the neutron population grow, shrink, or stay constant? The answer is captured in a single number called k, the effective multiplication factor.
The Multiplication Factor
Consider a generation of N neutrons in a fissile assembly. After they undergo various reactions (fission, scattering, absorption, leakage), a new generation of neutrons is produced. The ratio of successive generations defines k:
$$k = \frac{N_{n+1}}{N_n} = \frac{\text{neutrons in generation } n+1}{\text{neutrons in generation } n}$$
Three regimes exist:
| Condition | Name | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| k < 1 | Subcritical | Neutron population decreases exponentially |
| k = 1 | Critical | Neutron population remains constant |
| k > 1 | Supercritical | Neutron population increases exponentially |
The Six-Factor Formula
For thermal reactors, k can be decomposed into the six-factor formula:
$$k = \eta f p \epsilon P_{NL}^T P_{NL}^F$$
where:
- η (eta): Neutrons produced per thermal neutron absorbed in fuel (~2.1 for Pu-239)
- f: Thermal utilization—fraction of absorptions that occur in fuel
- p: Resonance escape probability—fraction of neutrons that avoid resonance capture while slowing down
- ε: Fast fission factor—boost from fast fissions in U-238
- P_NL^T: Thermal non-leakage probability
- P_NL^F: Fast non-leakage probability
For our bare plutonium football, this simplifies considerably:
- Pure fuel: f = 1
- No moderator: p = 1, ε ≈ 1
- No thermal neutrons: η replaced by fast-spectrum average
The remaining physics is dominated by the non-leakage probability.
k-effective vs k-infinite
Two versions of k are commonly used:
k_∞ (k-infinite)
The multiplication factor for an infinitely large system with no leakage:
$$k_\infty = \frac{\text{neutron production}}{\text{absorption}}$$
For Pu-239, using energy-averaged cross sections: $$k_\infty = \frac{\bar{\nu} \Sigma_f}{\Sigma_a} = \frac{\bar{\nu} \sigma_f}{\sigma_f + \sigma_c}$$
With ν̄ ≈ 2.9, σ_f ≈ 1.7 b, and σ_c ≈ 0.01 b: $$k_\infty \approx \frac{2.9 \times 1.7}{1.7 + 0.01} \approx 2.88$$
This is greater than 2—pure Pu-239 has ample criticality margin.
k_eff (k-effective)
The actual multiplication factor including leakage:
$$k_{eff} = k_\infty P_{NL}$$
where P_NL is the non-leakage probability. For a finite assembly:
$$P_{NL} = \frac{\text{neutrons absorbed}}{\text{neutrons absorbed + escaped}}$$
The non-leakage probability depends on geometry, size, and material. A sphere minimizes surface area (and thus leakage) for a given volume.
Criticality Calculation
For a given geometry and material, finding k_eff is an eigenvalue problem. The neutron transport equation can be written:
$$\hat{L}\phi = \frac{1}{k}\hat{F}\phi$$
where:
- \(\hat{L}\) is the loss operator (absorption + leakage)
- \(\hat{F}\) is the fission production operator
- \(\phi\) is the neutron flux
- \(k\) is the eigenvalue we seek
The physical interpretation: the fission source must be scaled by 1/k to maintain steady state.
Power Iteration
The standard numerical method is power iteration:
- Guess an initial fission source distribution S₀(r)
- Solve for the flux: \(\hat{L}\phi_n = S_n\)
- Calculate the new source: \(S_{n+1} = \hat{F}\phi_n\)
- Estimate k: \(k_n = \frac{\int S_{n+1}}{\int S_n}\)
- Normalize: \(S_{n+1} \leftarrow S_{n+1} / k_n\)
- Repeat until converged
Monte Carlo implements this by tracking neutrons generation by generation.
Reactivity
The reactivity ρ measures the departure from critical:
$$\rho = \frac{k - 1}{k}$$
| k | ρ | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | -5.26% | Subcritical |
| 0.99 | -1.01% | Slightly subcritical |
| 1.00 | 0 | Critical |
| 1.01 | +0.99% | Slightly supercritical |
| 1.05 | +4.76% | Supercritical |
Reactivity is often expressed in “dollars” where 1 dollar = β (the delayed neutron fraction). For Pu-239:
- 1 dollar = 0.22% = 220 pcm
- Prompt critical occurs at ρ = β (1 dollar)
Our football calculation will show ρ ≈ +17%, or about 75 dollars supercritical—deeply in the prompt supercritical regime.
Prompt vs Delayed Criticality
Delayed Critical (0 < ρ < β)
The system is critical including delayed neutrons. The neutron population grows slowly, with a period of seconds to minutes. Reactors operate in this regime.
Prompt Critical (ρ = β)
The system is critical on prompt neutrons alone. At this point, the delayed neutrons become irrelevant for population growth. The reactor period drops to milliseconds.
Prompt Supercritical (ρ > β)
Each prompt neutron generation produces more than one prompt neutron. Exponential growth occurs on a timescale of:
$$T = \frac{l}{k_p - 1}$$
where l is the prompt neutron generation time (~10 ns for fast systems) and k_p is the prompt multiplication factor.
For our football with k ≈ 1.2: $$T \approx \frac{10^{-8}}{0.2} = 50 \text{ ns}$$
The neutron population doubles every 50 nanoseconds—this is a nuclear explosion.
Critical Mass
The critical mass is the minimum mass of fissile material needed to achieve k = 1 for a given geometry.
Critical mass depends strongly on:
- Material: Pu-239 < U-233 < U-235
- Density: Higher density → smaller critical mass
- Shape: Sphere is optimal
- Reflector: Surrounding material can reduce critical mass by 30-50%
- Enrichment: Higher fissile fraction → lower critical mass
Bare Critical Masses
For bare (unreflected) spheres:
| Material | Density (g/cm³) | Critical Mass (kg) | Critical Radius (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pu-239 (α-phase) | 19.86 | 10.0 | 4.9 |
| Pu-239 (δ-phase) | 15.8 | 16.3 | 6.4 |
| U-233 | 18.8 | 16.4 | 5.8 |
| U-235 | 18.7 | 52.0 | 8.7 |
Delta-phase plutonium has 63% higher critical mass than alpha-phase due to its lower density. But delta-phase is used in weapons because alpha-phase is brittle and pyrophoric.
The Football
Our NFL football holds about 22 kg of delta-phase plutonium—about 35% above critical mass. Even accounting for the suboptimal shape (higher leakage than a sphere), this is supercritical.
Geometry Effects
The non-leakage probability depends on the buckling, which quantifies how curved the flux distribution is:
$$B^2 = \frac{\nabla^2 \phi}{\phi}$$
For a sphere of radius R: $$B^2 = \left(\frac{\pi}{R}\right)^2$$
For an ellipsoid with semi-axes a, b, c: $$B^2 = \frac{\pi^2}{a^2} + \frac{\pi^2}{b^2} + \frac{\pi^2}{c^2}$$
The non-leakage probability is approximately: $$P_{NL} \approx \frac{1}{1 + L^2 B^2}$$
where L is the neutron diffusion length.
A sphere minimizes buckling (and thus maximizes P_NL) for a given volume. Any other shape has higher leakage and requires more mass to go critical.
For our football shape:
- Volume equivalent to a sphere of radius ~8.2 cm
- But actual half-length is 14 cm with pointed ends
- Effective buckling is ~15% higher than equivalent sphere
- Critical mass is ~15% higher than spherical configuration
Summary
| Parameter | Value for Pu-239 Football |
|---|---|
| k_∞ | ~2.9 |
| P_NL | ~0.42 |
| k_eff | ~1.2 |
| ρ | ~17% |
| Status | Prompt supercritical |
The football is deeply supercritical. In the next chapter, we’ll see how Monte Carlo methods calculate k_eff by simulating individual neutrons.